Article
Cooperative learning and learning of the subject of language and literature in students third year unified general
high school
1
Cooperative learning and learning of the subject of language and
literature in third year unified general baccalaureate students
Aprendizaje cooperativo y aprendizaje de la asignatura de lenguaje y literatura en
estudiantes tercer año bachillerato general unificado
Aprendizagem cooperativa e aprendizagem da disciplina de língua e literatura em
estudantes do terceiro ano do bacharelato geral unificadoThe basic training
Esperanza Murillo García
Master in Education, Universidad Estatal de Guayaquil, Guayaquil, Ecuador,
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8945-8998
Abelardo Rodolfo Campana Concha
D. in Education, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima - Peru,
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1098-9508.
Received March 2021 - Accepted July 2021
Revista Iberoamericana de la Educación
Vol - 5 No. 1, January - March 2022
e-ISSN: 2737-632x
Pgs 1-12
Abstract:
To know the influence of cooperative learning and learning the subject of
language and literature, corresponds to the pre-experimental study, pre- and
post-test instruments were applied, the sample consisted of 27 students, the
data were processed by the SPSS statistic, pretest resulted with average 5.44
points, the average difference of the post-test with 8.33 points, showing an
increase of 2.89 points, likewise occurs with the specific hypotheses,
cooperative learning improved the learning of language and literature,
showing improvements as a result of the strategy used.
Keywords: cooperative learning, language, literature.
Resumen: Conocer la influencia del aprendizaje cooperativo y aprendizaje
de la asignatura de lenguaje y literatura, corresponde al estudio pre
Article
Cooperative learning and learning of the subject of language and literature in students third year unified general
high school
2
experimental, se aplicó instrumentos de pre y pos test, la muestra consistió 27
estudiantes, los datos fueron procesados por el estadístico SPSS, pretest
resultó con promedio 5,44 puntos, la diferencia medias del postest con 8,33
puntos, evidenciando incremento de 2,89 puntos, igualmente ocurre con las
hipótesis específicas, el aprendizaje cooperativo mejoró el aprendizaje del
lenguaje y literatura, mostrando mejoras producto de la estrategia empleada.
Palabras clave: aprendizaje cooperativo, lenguaje, literatura.
Resumo: Para conhecer a influência da aprendizagem cooperativa e da
aprendizagem da disciplina de língua e literatura, corresponde ao estudo pré-
experimental, foram aplicados instrumentos pré e pós-teste, a amostra
consistiu em 27 estudantes, os dados foram processados pela estatística do
SPSS, o pré-teste resultou com uma média de 5,44 pontos, a diferença média
do pós-teste com 8,33 pontos, mostrando um aumento de 2,89 pontos,
também ocorre com as hipóteses específicas, a aprendizagem cooperativa
melhorou a aprendizagem de língua e literatura, mostrando melhorias produto
da estratégia empregada.
Palavras-chave: aprendizagem cooperativa, língua, literatura.
INTRODUCTION
The present study was conducted with the purpose of verifying how high
school students use collaborative learning during their studies to improve
their professional competencies.
(LOEI, 2011), the unified general baccalaureate mentions:
"It comprises three years of compulsory education following General
Basic Education. Its purpose is to provide people with a general
education and an interdisciplinary preparation that guides them in the
Article
Cooperative learning and learning of the subject of language and literature in students third year unified general
high school
3
development of life projects and allows them to integrate into society
as responsible, critical and caring human beings" (p.23).
In addition, there are two options: a baccalaureate in science and a technical
baccalaureate, the former trains students in scientific-humanistic areas, the
latter focuses on technical, craft, sports or artistic areas.
According to the curriculum of the Ministry of Education of Ecuador
(Minedu, 2016) the subject of Language and Literature fosters "in the student
procedures and attitudes related to respect for themselves and others involved
in the communicative process; the responsibility to assume one's own
discourses, and the necessary academic honesty when generating them"
(p.42).
However, we have evidenced that traditional teaching is still predominant,
without guaranteeing student learning, only a few teachers take cooperative
learning as an option, thus the need to promote it in order for students to
improve their grades.
There are precedents, such as those of Martín (2015) who demonstrated the
need to promote collaborative groups among teachers to contrast ideas,
knowledge and conclusions, in order to train and transform teaching from
daily practice. For his part, García (2015) considers that as students act with
this methodology, in virtual groups they achieve good learning.
Therefore, the objective of this study is to analyze the influence between the
use of cooperative learning and language and communication learning in third
year students of the unified general high school in Guayaquil - Ecuador, 2020.
Johnson, Johnson and Holubec (1999) mention: "cooperative learning is a
methodological strategy that consists of the work done by a group of students
in order to achieve common goals. In cooperation, individuals carry out joint
Article
Cooperative learning and learning of the subject of language and literature in students third year unified general
high school
4
activities to achieve results that are beneficial not only for themselves but for
all members of the group".
Pliego (2011) defines "cooperative learning as a broad and heterogeneous set
of structured instructional methods in which students work together, in groups
or teams, helping each other in generally academic tasks".
Mayordomo and Onrubia (2015) explain that students have better
understanding when the contents have a link with their previous ideas and
representations, being able to control their own learning, this implication
allows interaction with other people to contrast their ideas, indicating that
collaborative learning fits perfectly with "instructional and educational
proposals that try to overcome the limitations of a traditional conception of
teaching, betting on the design of new and more powerful teaching and
learning environments".
Feldman (2005) defines learning as "a process of relatively permanent change
in a person's behavior generated by experience".
Pérez (2000, p.73) states that learning is "any modification of the organism
that originates a new pattern of thought and/or behavior". Pérez (2015, p.72)
affirms that learning "is the activity of the person that aims at the knowledge
of the truth. In it participates the self in its integrity, but in a special way the
faculties related to knowledge, such as the senses and the intellect, together
with the will".
Anderson (2001) considers that learning is a mechanism by which organisms
can adapt to a changing environment.
Barriga (2015) mentions: "it is a type of border, it occurs in earlier stages of
speech development, the individual reaches the basic knowledge of the
system, linguistic competence, and the final stages, restructures what has been
learned, linguistic knowledge is adapted to the social system, through
communicative competence".
Article
Cooperative learning and learning of the subject of language and literature in students third year unified general
high school
5
Ortega (2018) states, "at the end of the preschool stage they develop
fundamental linguistic skills, based on obtaining all the phonemes of the
language, also writing skills and semantic acquisitions, showing fluency to
communicate orally".
Franja (2015) mentions that language is given through the cognitivist model,
within which the relevance of the environment stands out as well as the inner
capacity of the individual to be able to form a bond with the surrounding
environment, thereby emphasizing that a mutual relationship must be
established.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This pre-experimental applied research was applied to a single group, and the
following aspects were considered:
Type of question : Applied
Hypothesis testing : Cause - effect
Measurement variables : Quantitative
Number of variable : Bivariate
Environment : Field
Data source : Primary
Application : Longitudinal
Design : Pre experimental
For statistical purposes and to test the hypotheses, the SPSS 21 program was
used to process the data found in the instruments applied and to demonstrate
the hypotheses proposed. The following graph explains the pre-experimental
design:
GE = O1 ------------X-----------O2
GE: Sample or working group
O1: observation 1
Article
Cooperative learning and learning of the subject of language and literature in students third year unified general
high school
6
O2: observation 2
X: Training
Reliability of the instruments: they were subjected to Cronbach's Alpha, result.
Table 1: Reliability
Cronbach's alpha
N of elements
,675
4
The reliability of the instrument was applied to the dependent: learning the
subject of language and literature, according to Cronbach's alpha was 0.675,
representing 67.5%, representing a good tendency for its application.
RESULTS
The collaborative teaching strategy was applied in the present study for a
period of 4 months, so that students could improve their language and
literature skills.
During the process of application of the mentioned strategy, the learning
outcome on the subject shown by the sample has been positively evidenced.
After the process was completed, it was possible to achieve the proposed
objective presented below:
The use of cooperative learning increases the learning of language and
communication in students of third year general unified high school
Guayaquil - Ecuador, 2020.
Table 1. Mean difference: dependent variable
Language and
Literature
N
Standard
deviation.
Pre test
27
,641
Posttest
27
,814
Source: Esperanza Murillo (2020)
Article
Cooperative learning and learning of the subject of language and literature in students third year unified general
high school
7
The pre-test averages reached an average of 5.44, while the post-test score
was 8.33, which proves the effectiveness of collaborative learning in the
subject of language and literature.
Cooperative learning enhances the learning of 19th century poetry.
Table 2. Mean between pre- and post-test dimension 1
Nineteenth
Century Poetry
N
Media
Deviation.
Mean
standard
error
Pre test
27
5,37
,688
,132
Post test
27
7,74
,712
,137
Source: Esperanza Murillo (2020)
A mean difference of 2.37 was found between the entry and exit tests.
The pretest mean reached an average of 5.37, then when applied in the posttest
it was 8.33, thus proving the effectiveness of collaborative learning in the
topics of 19th century Poetry.
Cooperative learning enhances the learning of 19th century Ecuadorian
narrative.
The pretest mean reached an average of 5.70, then when applied in the posttest
it was 8.70, thus proving the effectiveness of collaborative learning in the
topics of the Ecuadorian narrative of the nineteenth century.
Cooperative learning has an impact on the learning of 19th and 20th century
Ecuadorian literature.
The pretest mean reached an average of 5.37, then when applied in the posttest
it was 7.96, thus proving the effectiveness of collaborative learning in the
subjects of 19th and 20th century Ecuadorian literature.
Cooperative learning helps the learning of the poets of the second half of the
20th century.
Article
Cooperative learning and learning of the subject of language and literature in students third year unified general
high school
8
In the pretest the students achieved an average of 5.37, then when applied in
the posttest it was 8.22, thus proving the effectiveness of collaborative
learning in the topics of Poets of the second half of the twentieth century.
Cooperative learning increases the learning of the narrator of the 20th century.
In the pretest the students achieved an average of 5.59, then when applying
the posttest evaluation, the result was 8.56, thus proving the effectiveness of
collaborative learning in the topics of Narrators of the 20th century.
Cooperative learning helps the learning of literature of the late twentieth
century and early twenty-first century.
The pretest mean reached an average of 5.59, then when applied in the posttest
it was 8.56, thus proving the effectiveness of collaborative learning in the
subjects of Literature of the late twentieth century and early twenty-first
century.
The research consisted of answering the research objectives. In the general
hypothesis, an average of 5.44 was obtained with respect to the pretest mean,
while in the posttest an average of 8.33 was reached, that is, with the
application of cooperative learning, the students achieved an increase of 2.89
in their grades that represent the learning of the subject of language and
literature.
Responding to the approach of the first specific hypothesis, the pretest mean
obtained an average of 5.37, on the other hand the posttest achieved a score
of 7.74, confirming the benefit of applying cooperative learning with this
increase (2.37) of their learning with respect to the poetry of the nineteenth
century.
The second specific hypothesis, the pretest mean obtained an average of 5.70,
then in the posttest a score of 8.70, with this increase of 3.00 the positive
actions that cooperative learning generates in the themes of the Ecuadorian
narrative of the XIX century are proven.
Article
Cooperative learning and learning of the subject of language and literature in students third year unified general
high school
9
In H3, the pretest results reached an average of 5.37, then in the posttest
evaluations the students achieved an average score of 7.96, evidencing an
increase of 2.59 in the grades referring to Ecuadorian Literature XIX and XX
century, as a positive consequence of applying cooperative learning.
In the approach of H4, the results of the pretest the students reached an
average of 5.37, however these grades increased in the posttest whose average
was 8.22, that is a difference of 2.85, thus proving the effectiveness of
cooperative learning on the topic of Poets of the second half of the twentieth
century.
In response to the approach of the fifth specific hypothesis, the pretest mean
obtained an average of 5.59, on the other hand the posttest achieved a score
of 8.56, confirming the benefit of applying cooperative learning with this
increase (2.97) of their learning with respect to the 20th century Narrators.
The sixth specific hypothesis, the pretest mean obtained an average of 5.59,
then in the posttest a score of 8.56, with this increase of 2.97 proves the
positive actions that cooperative learning generates in the subjects of
Literature of the late twentieth century and early twenty-first century.
Contrasting these results with those of Alvarez (2015) evidenced the benefits
of cooperative learning, alerting more interaction among students, however
they consider they should be motivated by the teacher, although it does not
explain if it has a positive link in their grades, as if evidenced in our study, it
has the similarity of generating improvements in different formative aspects.
However, the results of Pinedo (2017) confirm the opposite, since according
to his statistical results cooperative learning are not related per se, however,
it is necessary to perform a cooperative approach and methodology to analyze
the changes made in students.
Article
Cooperative learning and learning of the subject of language and literature in students third year unified general
high school
10
CONCLUSIONS
Cooperative learning helps to improve grades in the subject of language and
literature, because before its application most of the students were failing,
however, considering this methodology they got very good grades. It is
positive to apply cooperative methodologies in high school students, because
they were able to increase their average in 2.37 points regarding Poetry of the
XIX century, going from failing (pretest) to good grades (posttest).
The students' knowledge about the Ecuadorian Narrative of the XIX century
increases with the application of cooperative learning, since the students in
the pretest and posttest obtained mostly failing and very good grades,
respectively, alerting its effectiveness.
High school students are able to improve their knowledge of 19th and 20th
century Ecuadorian Literature through a cooperative methodology, because
their results in pretest evaluations reached mostly failing grades, while in their
posttest tests, good, proving this increase in 2.59 points.
Cooperative learning allowed students to improve their averages in reference
to the theme of Poets of the second half of the twentieth century, going from
failing grades (pretest) to good grades (posttest), for the most part,
demonstrating its effectiveness for its application in the baccalaureate.
It is effective that cooperative learning is applied in high school students,
since it allows them to improve their grades in the subject of Narrators of the
20th century, who went from an average of 5.59 (pretest) to 8.56 (posttest),
most of them with very good grades.
Learning helps to increase the knowledge of Literature of the late 20th and
early 21st century in high school students, who at first stood out for their
failing grades, but later with the post-test and the appropriate methodology,
most of them achieved very good averages.
Article
Cooperative learning and learning of the subject of language and literature in students third year unified general
high school
11
REFERENCES
Alvarez, V. (2015) ICT-mediated cooperative learning in university
teaching: an approach to the perceptions and experiences of teachers
and students at the Autonomous University of Chihuahua [Doctoral
Thesis, University of Salamanca]. Available at:
https://gredos.usal.es/bitstream/handle/10366/127968/DDOMI_Alva
rezOlivasV_MetodosAudiovisualesPedagogia.pdf?sequence=1&isAl
lowed=y
Anderson, J. (2001). Learning and memory. A comprehensive approach.
Mexico: Mc Graw Hill.
Barriga, R. (2015). Study on children's speech in the school years. Editorial
del Colegio de México.
Feldman, J. (2002). Self-esteem: How to develop it? Narcea S.A. de
Ediciones.
García, C. (2015). Cooperative learning in virtual groups (relationships
between conditions, processes and learning outcomes of higher
education students in virtual environments [Doctoral Thesis, Open
University of Catalonia. Available at:
https://www.tesisenred.net/bitstream/handle/10803/307052/Tesis%2
0Consuelo%20Garcia%20Tamarit.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Johnson, D., Johnson, R., & Holubec, E. (1999). Cooperative learning in the
classroom. Editorial Paidós.
Law No. 417 of 2011. Organic Law on Comprehensive Education. March 31,
2011.
Martín, G. (2015). Use of cooperative learning for the transformation of
student learning and continuing education of teachers in a rural
grouped center [Doctoral Thesis, University of Valladolid]. Available
at:
http://uvadoc.uva.es/bitstream/handle/10324/7536/TESIS604141209.
pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Mayordomo, R. and Onrubia, J. (2015). El aprendizaje cooperativo. Editorial
AOC
Ministry of Education of Ecuador (2016). Curriculum for EGB and BGU.
Lengua y Literatura. Available at: https://educacion.gob.ec/wp-
content/uploads/downloads/2016/03/LENGUA.pdf
Article
Cooperative learning and learning of the subject of language and literature in students third year unified general
high school
12
Ortega, R. (2018). Levels of oral language development in 5-year-old
children of the network N°1 of ventanilla - Callao [Tesis Magisterial,
Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola].
Pérez, P. (2015). An educational theory. Theories of learning. University of
Piura, Nuestra Señora del Pilar, Vida y Familia.
Pinedo, M. (2017). Cooperative learning and academic performance in
university students of the faculty of administration of the Universidad
Nacional Federico Villareal, 2017 [Tesis Magisterial, Universidad
César Vallejo].
Pliego, N. (2011). Cooperative learning and its advantages in Intercultural
Education. Hekademos Digital Educational Journal, 4 (8). Available
at: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/3746890.pdf